We Are Discuss About CODECHEF SOLUTION
Balanced Suffix CodeChef Solution
Balanced Suffix CodeChef Solution
Problem
You’re given a string � of length � and an integer �.
Let � denote the set of all characters in �. The string � is called good if, for every suffix of S:
- The difference between the frequencies of any two characters in � does not exceed �.
In particular, if the set � has a single element, the string � is good.
Find whether there exists a rearrangement of � which is good.
If multiple such rearrangements exist, print the lexicographically smallest rearrangement.
If no such rearrangement exists, print −1 instead.
Note that a suffix of a string is obtained by deleting some (possibly zero) characters from the beginning of the string. For example, the suffixes of �=���� are {�,��,���,����}.
Input Format
- The first line of input will contain a single integer �, denoting the number of test cases.
- Each test case consists of two lines of input.
- The first line of each test case contains two space-separated integers � and � — the length of the string and the positive integer as mentioned in the statement, respectively.
- The next line consists of a string � of length � containing lowercase English alphabets only.
Output Format
For each test case, output on a new line the lexicographically smallest good rearrangement of �.
If no such rearrangement exists, print −1 instead.
Constraints
- 1≤�≤2000
- 1≤�≤105
- 1≤�≤�
- � consists of lowercase english alphabets only.
- The sum of � over all test cases won’t exceed 2⋅105.
Sample 1:
4 3 1 aaa 4 2 baba 4 1 babb 7 2 abcbcac
aaa aabb -1 abcabcc
Explanation:
Test case 1: Since �={�}, the string � is good.
Test case 2: The set �={�,�}. Consider the rearrangement ����. Let �� and �� denote the frequencies of � and � respectively:
- In suffix �, ��=1 and ��=0. Thus, ∣��−��∣=1≤�.
- In suffix ��, ��=2 and ��=0. Thus, ∣��−��∣=2≤�.
- In suffix ���, ��=2 and ��=1. Thus, ∣��−��∣=1≤�.
- In suffix ����, ��=2 and ��=2. Thus, ∣��−��∣=0≤�.
Thus, the rearrangement ���� is good. It is also the lexicographically smallest rearrangement possible of string �.
Test case 3: It can be proven that there exists no rearrangement of � which is good.
Test case 4: The set �={�,�,�}. Consider the rearrangement �������. Let ��,��, and �� denote the frequencies of �,�, and � respectively:
- In suffix �, ��=0,��=0, and ��=1. Thus, ∣��−��∣,∣��−��∣, and ∣��−��∣ are all less than or equal to �=2.
- In suffix ��, ��=0,��=0, and ��=2. Thus, ∣��−��∣,∣��−��∣, and ∣��−��∣ are all less than or equal to �=2.
- In suffix ���, ��=0,��=1, and ��=2. Thus, ∣��−��∣,∣��−��∣, and ∣��−��∣ are all less than or equal to �=2.
- In suffix ����, ��=1,��=1, and ��=2. Thus, ∣��−��∣,∣��−��∣, and ∣��−��∣ are all less than or equal to �=2.
- In suffix �����, ��=1,��=1, and ��=3. Thus, ∣��−��∣,∣��−��∣, and ∣��−��∣ are all less than or equal to �=2.
- In suffix ������, ��=1,��=2, and ��=3. Thus, ∣��−��∣,∣��−��∣, and ∣��−��∣ are all less than or equal to �=2.
- In suffix �������, ��=2,��=2, and ��=3. Thus, ∣��−��∣,∣��−��∣, and ∣��−��∣ are all less than or equal to �=2.
Thus, the rearrangement ������� is good. It is also the lexicographically smallest good rearrangement of string �.
SOLUTION
Here Discuss About Balanced Suffix CodeChef Solution
SOLUTION
Balanced Suffix CodeChef Solution
SOLUTION
Yhaa You have done it but next? if YOU Want to Get Others Please Visit Here ScishowEngineer Then Follow US HERE and Join Telegram.
If You Want To Learn Something New Then Visit Our Official Channel YOUTUBE